Kris Spisak

Writing Tip 385: “Flow” vs. “Floe”

“flow” vs. “floe”
Sure, your eye might land on the iceberg, but do you see all of those flat, floating sheets of ice? That’s what we’re talking about here.

Sometimes, you’ve just got to go with the flow, unless you’re riding along on an iceberg. Then, perhaps, it’s time to reconsider—your spelling among other things.

Actually, an “iceberg” is a bit misleading. When we’re talking about an “ice floe,” we’re not talking about giant mountains of ice.

Remember:

Long story short, “Flo” and “floe” have little to do with each other. There aren’t many blossoms on a sheet of ice—though a floe might just flow along in the Arctic waters. As for “Flo” and “flow,” who knows? Maybe you know a Flo who’s really good at getting into her flow state. Maybe she’s great at “going with the flow.” (That’s actually a newborn expression if you’re curious. It came to be in the late 1900s.)

This “Flow” vs. “Floe” discussion is not to be confused with “flew” vs. “flu” vs. “flue,” and it is making me think a bit about the difference between “bitter cold” vs. “bitterly cold”—but we’ll leave those explorations for another day.

Happy writing, all!


Sign up for my language trivia and communications tips email newsletter for more like this.

Exit mobile version